The creative agency Peter Principle - reputation gone wrong
Uri
Coming across some really bad advertising and branding lately, from some of the world’s leading agencies, I realised the following:
Every creative agency evolves to the point where it has the highest chance to have bad ideas approved by clients and implemented.
How?
- Every creative process involves the creation of some bad ideas along good ones.
- Creatives are often not objective about their own ideas, and will occasionally try to pitch them to clients.
- You’d think that the better an agency’s reputation is, the more clients expect, but the reality is that this reputation will have a certain voodoo affect, intimidating clients into believing that maybe not getting the agency’s ideas is their own fault (emperor’s new cloths).
- The fact that successful agencies tend to become better and better presenters and sellers of ideas as they evolve also helps.
- The amount/rate of bad ideas succeeding in traveling outside of the agency may decrease with experience, but then ego, which grows with reputation, kicks in and “mitigates” criticism.
- So a top-5 agency, has a better chances of selling a bad idea to it’s client than anybody else. QED
Wikipedia: “The Peter Principle is a theory originated by Dr. Laurence J. Peter. It states that successful members of a hierarchical organization are eventually promoted to their highest level of competence, after which further promotion raises them to a level at which they are not
competent.”
This post has been getting quite a lot of traffic from new visitors. Hello and welcome!
If you related to this post, you may want to read just what do i mean by “Marketing Babylon”
Since this isn’t a high traffic blog, you may also consider subscribing via RSS or e-mail (from the form on on the right hand column).
Technorati Tags: creative, advertisement, ideas, creativity, irony
Posted in Marketing | View blog reactions |
5 Comments »| Trackback
